The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Can political institutions insulate against political backlash when dismantling fossil fuel subsidies?

Jakob Skovgaard and Evan Drake, photo.
Associate Professor Jakob Skovgaard och doctoral student Evan Drake at the Department of Political Science, Lund University.

Subsidies to fossil fuels – oil, coal and gas – are notoriously difficult to reform with global subsidy levels reaching a record $1.5 trillion in 2022. In a new article, Evan Drake and Jakob Skovgaard study how two political institutions, corporatism and electoral systems with proportional representation, impact the levels of fossil fuel subsidies.

Comparing fossil fuel production subsidies in Canada and Germany, they find that corporatism and proportional representation can reduce the risk of backlash against politicians when they dismantle these subsidies, and make reform efforts more likely to succeed in the long-run. 

Authors: Evan Drake & Jakob Skovgaard

Title: Do Political Institutions Influence the Dismantling of Fossil Fuel Subsidies? Lessons from the OECD Countries and a Comparative Analysis of Canadian and German Production Subsidies

Link to article: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13876988.2024.2328605